Juan Williams Claims Harris’ Loss Isn’t About ‘The Cost of Eggs’, It’s About ‘Voting for This Black Woman’

In a post-election analysis on Fox News, political analyst Juan Williams argued that Kamala Harris’ potential defeat stemmed more from racial dynamics and “white grudge politics” than from economic concerns such as “the cost of eggs.” Williams suggested that bias against Harris’ race and gender influenced voter hesitation, saying, “I’m not sold on the idea that, oh, it was the price of eggs.” I’m afraid it was, ‘Well, I’m not voting for this woman. Or I’m not voting for this black woman.’” Williams emphasized that racial tensions and targeting may have played a role in the election outcome, pointing to Trump’s efforts to mobilize white male turnout through specific appeals.

Fox commentator Karl Rove offered a counterpoint, arguing that Trump’s appeal to black male voters was based on economic promises rather than racial grievances. “He didn’t go out and say vote for me because I’m not a woman,” Rove argued, attributing Trump’s support among minority groups to his focus on prosperity and economic opportunity. “They thought he was a strong, effective leader,” Rove added, citing Trump’s focus on inflation and immigration as resonant concerns.

Williams doubled down on his position, noting that political figures “can exploit those tensions” for electoral gain. He highlighted what he called Trump’s “bro strategy” for mobilizing white male voters, while Rove insisted voters supported Trump “despite” controversial comments.