Famous squirrel that was euthanized after being removed from home tests negative for rabies

Peanut, the social media star squirrel who was at the center of a national furor after he was taken from his owner in upstate New York and euthanized, has tested negative for rabies, a county official said Tuesday.

The state Department of Environmental Conservation took the squirrel and a raccoon named Fred from Mark Longo’s home and animal shelter in rural Pine City, near the Pennsylvania border, on Oct. 30. The agency said it had received complaints that wild animals were being kept illegally and possibly unsafely, but officials faced a barrage of criticism over the seizure. Government officials said they have since faced violent threats.

BACKGROUND: DEC officers union says public was misled in seizure and death of Peanut the Squirrel | The man who took in orphaned Peanut the squirrel is speaking out after pets were euthanized

The DEC and Chemung County officials have said the squirrel and raccoon were euthanized so they could be tested for rabies after Peanut bit a DEC employee involved in the investigation.

Chemung County Executive Chris Moss said tests on the two animals came back negative during a news conference detailing the county’s role in the incident. He said the county was working with the state and following protocols.

Peanut gained tens of thousands of followers on Instagram, TikTok and other platforms in the more than seven years since Longo took him in after seeing his mother hit by a car in New York City. Longo has said he was in the process of filing paperwork to have Peanut certified as an educational animal when he was seized.

Longo said Tuesday that the negative test results were not a surprise and criticized the government’s actions.

‘It’s not really a big shock to me as I lived with Peanut for seven and a half years and with Fred for five months. “I’m not foaming at the mouth,” he said. “I knew the test results would be negative.”

The DEC said in a prepared statement that there was an internal investigation and that they were reviewing internal policies and procedures.

_____