James Copenhagen video

All videos of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump must be verified for accuracy and truth. James Copenhaver’s video contains footage that is wildly different from reality. FOX 5 News says “this is the video Copenhaver took at the time of the shooting.” He was sitting in the stands to the left of President Trump. James Copenhaver says he (Copenhaver) was hit by the second bullet. The first bullet hit President Trump. So he would have been hit about a second later in a random pattern. He was hit in the arm and stomach (NY Post).

In James Copenhaver’s (74) video, the AGR building is seen right next to the rally, and to say it is too close to the scene seems an understatement because it is so close to the rally that there is no grassy area between the AGR building and the rally in his video, an area CNN estimates to be 120 to 150 meters long. The background behind the building in his video does not show the actual buildings that are behind the AGR building. His video is the first link (below). In addition to these structural and distance issues in the video, there are physical impossibilities in the way the man on the roof is shown (his head on the roof, primarily). There are undeniable lies in the video he shared with the media.

The head depicted on the roof is moving rapidly to the right (from the viewer’s perspective). This is a low-slope roof, and for the shooter’s head to be seen moving so rapidly, he would have had to be running at a lower point on the roof, and his head would then not be visible from ground level as shown in the video; and, vice versa, anyone in that position who stopped and looked to their right would not see the rally even if they were right next to it.

Otherwise, for the head to move like in the video, the man would have to crawl right next to the highest point of the roof, but the head moves in a vertical position and at a speed incompatible with the idea of ​​someone crawling on the roof. I estimate that he moves about ten meters like that.

The video does not meet any test of truthfulness and correspondence with reality. The man cannot run on the roof because we would not see him, and he cannot crawl because his head moves too fast, and it actually moves as if he were running. This is something fake, obviously.

The head shown disappears in the video for a moment, then reappears at the location where he allegedly fired the 8 shots. The video ends just before the man fires the first shot, so shortly before Donald Trump is shot in the ear. The media doesn’t ask questions, the FBI doesn’t investigate, any video is welcome…

People are supposed to imagine what is missing before and after, and accept this video as further evidence against the young man (Crooks). But who wants to accept this video, even if it is provided by the second man beaten on July 13, when that is the case.

None of these videos demonstrate, or can demonstrate, that the young man (Thomas Crooks) was the shooter. On the contrary, the fact that they show fake images that do not correspond to reality, that cannot pass any reality test, completely changes the facts of the crime (logically speaking). The video may be of James Copenhaver, who indicates that he was hit right after Trump, but it is not the AGR building, because it is at least 120 meters from the assembly area, with a lot of grass in between, and therefore the head in the video is not the head of the 20-year-old either. Maybe it is just a “head”, but in a video with such blatant lies, the nature of the head or its affiliation does not even matter.

Let’s pay attention to James Copenhagen’s post about what happened that day and look for some background information:

“Mr. Copenhaver, 74, is from Moon Township, Pa. Records show that he was registered as a Democrat.” The New York Times – 7/14/24.

FOX 5 Atlanta (02/08/24): “He told his attorney that the assassination attempt was sad, that his injuries were an unnecessary tragedy and that it showed the political division in the country.” His attorney told the news program, “He wants people to understand that this doesn’t have to happen.”

Don’t be like that, he said. The shooter was treated by some as if he were a good example of what Americans are like today. The FBI calls it “domestic terrorism.” Since it started as foreign terrorism, the American people supposedly learned it from Osama bin Laden. Then this (false?) position elaborates on why it is “domestic” terrorism, and then, as we know, the entire population is told not to be like that, and that’s not really the end of the story, since this “new reality” continues as far as it can go. If you don’t understand that there can be no “domestic” terrorism, you can’t be a so-called public servant (only a “public oppressor”). “What begins badly ends badly.”

Fox 5 Atlanta: “Here’s the video Copenhagen took at the time of the shooting. Feltman, his attorney, said he was in shock and didn’t notice the second bullet that hit him at first.”

So he had to film the first two shots.

Here is the video of James Copenhagen, 0:28 – 1:35 approximately

The following bodycam footage shows the actual buildings behind the AGR building (at 5:09); the cover photo for this sequence also shows these buildings; and at the beginning we see the actual distance between the assembly area and the AGR building (at 1:48). At 5:48 the lifeless body is visible, a blurry image, but we can see that it is lying more than a meter below the peak of the roof. There is no blood in the space between the head and the peak of the roof (5:45), so his body was not pushed down from the peak and died there or further down. There is a long trail of blood below.

You see, he couldn’t see the rally from where he died. He couldn’t see the scene – no one can from that spot. I don’t think the snipers on the roofs of barns can see him there because it’s like hiding from view, unless the barn is much taller – but I can’t go any further because of the facts that impose limits on what can be logically deduced. The “experts” can determine that. Or we if we were walking around there measuring the height of the buildings (laughter). There is a point or case where only professional investigators can solve “who did it”. We can (must) demand a good investigation and help if we can. What I do know is that he can’t shoot below there (the rifle can only be pointed skyward from there). My article “The Young Man Was the “Scapegoat”” had that fact as its main thesis point.

His rifle is visible in the video a few feet to the left of the dead man on the roof. I can’t identify him as Mr. “Crooks” when the accusers haven’t even found a misleading video, and the media presents the videos as valid, supposedly proving that the young man (Crooks) is guilty and also a lone gunman.

AGR building body camera footage

I’m including this link to the NY Post. It shows the face of the dead man; his body had been turned over, but only they know what the original position of the body was. In the video above, the body is seen face down and also face up. The location of the wound is clearer than the identity of the man.

Third picture from the top. Look at this.

The Best of John Leo Keenan